RESUMO
Objective: To update the evidence map on the effects of interventions for post-acute COVID-19 rehabilitation. Method: The search scope was defined according to the population (patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and post-acute COVID sequelae), the context (interventions for rehabilitation), and the type of study (systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews or overviews of reviews). Following a search in PubMed and the Virtual Health Library, two independent authors selected the articles for review. The map was updated on July 27, 2022, using the same procedures employed in the initial review. Results: The initial evidence map included 22 studies (four systematic reviews, four rapid reviews, four reviews of case reports, one scoping review, and nine systematic review protocols). In the present update, an additional 10 studies were included. The analysis revealed four groups of interventions (multimodal, therapeutic, complementary, and pharmacological) and seven groups of outcomes (pathological conditions, diseases/respiratory disorders, pain, physiological and metabolic markers, mental health/quality of life, sensory function, and mortality), totaling 166 associations between interventions and outcomes. The highest number of associations was observed for complementary therapies (n = 94). Among the outcomes, the highest number of associations was observed for physiological and metabolic markers, pathological conditions, and mental health/quality of life (44, 41, and 35 associations respectively). Conclusions: The map update involved the analysis of 69 associations, most notably exercise (isolated, multicomponent, or multimodal intervention), with 23 positive and four potentially positive effects) and pharmacologic and complementary therapies for sensorial functions (15 associations). The high number of systematic review protocols indicates that the literature is still incipient.
Objetivo: Actualizar el mapa de evidencia de los efectos de las intervenciones de rehabilitación tras la COVID-19 aguda. Métodos: El alcance de la búsqueda se definió en función de la población (pacientes que habían tenido COVID-19 sintomática y secuelas tras un cuadro agudo de la enfermedad), el contexto (intervenciones de recuperación de las secuelas) y el tipo de estudio (revisión sistemática, revisión sistemática rápida, revisión del alcance o revisión de revisiones). Después de realizar búsquedas en PubMed y en la Biblioteca Virtual de Salud, dos autores independientes seleccionaron los estudios de revisión. En la actualización del mapa realizada el 27 de julio del 2022 se siguieron los mismos procedimientos descritos anteriormente. Resultados: El mapa de evidencia inicial contenía 22 estudios (cuatro revisiones sistemáticas, cuatro revisiones rápidas, cuatro revisiones de estudios de casos, una revisión del alcance y nueve protocolos de revisión sistemática). En esta actualización se incluyeron otros 10 estudios. Se encontraron cuatro grupos de intervenciones (multimodales y terapéuticas, y tratamientos complementarios y farmacológicos) y siete grupos de resultados (afecciones patológicas, enfermedades y trastornos respiratorios, dolor, indicadores fisiológicos y metabólicos, salud mental/calidad de vida, funciones sensoriales y mortalidad), con un total de 166 asociaciones entre las intervenciones y los resultados. Los tratamientos complementarios presentaron más asociaciones con los resultados (n = 94). Entre los resultados, se destacaron los indicadores fisiológicos y metabólicos, las afecciones patológicas y la salud mental/calidad de vida (44, 41 y 35 asociaciones, respectivamente). Conclusiones: En la actualización del mapa, se analizaron 69 asociaciones entre las cuales se destacan el ejercicio (aislado o compuesto o una intervención multimodal, con 23 efectos positivos y cuatro potencialmente positivos) y las intervenciones farmacológicas y los tratamientos complementarios para las funciones sensoriales (15 asociaciones). El elevado número de protocolos indica que la bibliografía sigue siendo incipiente.
RESUMO
RESUMO Objetivo. Atualizar o mapa de evidências sobre os efeitos de intervenções para reabilitação de covid-19 pós-aguda. Métodos. O escopo da busca foi definido conforme a população (pacientes que tiveram covid-19 sintomática e sequelas da doença pós-aguda), o contexto (intervenções para recuperação das sequelas) e o tipo de estudo (revisão sistemática, revisão sistemática rápida, revisão de escopo ou revisão de revisões). Após a busca na PubMed e na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, dois autores independentes selecionaram estudos de revisão. A atualização do mapa feita em 27 de julho de 2022 seguiu os mesmos procedimentos descritos anteriormente. Resultados. O mapa inicial de evidências continha 22 estudos (quatro revisões sistemáticas, quatro revisões rápidas, quatro revisões de estudos de caso, uma revisão de escopo e nove protocolos de revisão sistemática). Nesta atualização, outros 10 estudos foram incluídos. Foram identificados quatro grupos de intervenções (multimodal, terapêutica, terapias complementares e farmacológica) e sete grupos de desfechos (condições patológicas, doenças/transtornos respiratórios, dor, indicadores fisiológicos e metabólicos, saúde mental/qualidade de vida, funções sensoriais, mortalidade), totalizando 166 associações entre intervenções e desfechos. As terapias complementares tiveram mais associações com os desfechos (n = 94). Entre os desfechos, destacaram-se os indicadores fisiológicos e metabólicos, as condições patológicas e a saúde mental/qualidade de vida (44, 41 e 35 associações, respectivamente). Conclusões. Na atualização do mapa, analisaram-se 69 associações, com destaque para exercício (isolado, multicomponente ou intervenção multimodal, apresentando 23 efeitos positivos e quatro potencialmente positivos) e intervenções farmacológicas e terapias complementares para funções sensoriais (15 associações). O alto número de protocolos indica que a literatura permanece incipiente.
RESUMO
Globally, better health care access and social conditions ensured a significant increase in the life expectancy of the population. There is, however, a clear increase in the incidence of age-related diseases which, besides affecting the social and economic sustainability of countries and regions around the globe, leads to a decrease in the individual's quality of life. There is an urgent need for interventions that can reverse, or at least prevent and delay, the age-associated pathological deterioration. Within this line, this narrative review aims to assess updated evidence that explores the potential therapeutic targets that can mimic or complement the recognized anti-aging effects of physical exercise. We considered pertinent to review the anti-aging effects of the following drugs and supplements: Rapamycin and Rapamycin analogues (Rapalogs); Metformin; 2-deoxy-D-glucose; Somatostatin analogues; Pegvisomant; Trametinib; Spermidine; Fisetin; Quercetin; Navitoclax; TA-65; Resveratrol; Melatonin; Curcumin; Rhodiola rosea and Caffeine. The current scientific evidence on the anti-aging effect of these drugs and supplements is still scarce and no recommendation of their generalized use can be made at this stage. Further studies are warranted to determine which therapies display a geroprotective effect and are capable of emulating the benefits of physical exercise.
Assuntos
Longevidade , Qualidade de Vida , Exercício Físico , Sirolimo/farmacologiaRESUMO
In recent years, several advances have been observed in vaccinology especially for neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). One of the tools employed is epitope prediction by immunoinformatic approaches that reduce the time and cost to develop a vaccine. In this scenario, immunoinformatics is being more often used to develop vaccines for NTDs, in particular visceral leishmaniasis (VL) which is proven not to have an effective vaccine yet. Based on that, in a previous study, two predicted T-cell multi-epitope chimera vaccines were experimentally validated in BALB/c mice to evaluate the immunogenicity, central and effector memory and protection against VL. Considering the results obtained in the mouse model, we assessed the immune response of these chimeras inMesocricetus auratushamster, which displays, experimentally, similar pathological status to human and dog VL disease. Our findings indicate that both chimeras lead to a dominant Th1 response profile, inducing a strong cellular response by increasing the production of IFN-γ and TNF-α cytokines associated with a decrease in IL-10. Also, the chimeras reduced the spleen parasite load and the weight a correlation between protector immunological mechanisms and consistent reduction of the parasitic load was observed. Our results demonstrate that both chimeras were immunogenic and corroborate with findings in the mouse model. Therefore, we reinforce the use of the hamster as a pre-clinical model in vaccination trials for canine and human VL and the importance of immunoinformatic to identify epitopes to design vaccines for this important neglected disease.